Copywriters, give the sales argument a source to stand on.
Evidence Copy Kit
1 skill + 19 prompts. ZIP by email.
Supplied input No proof supplied
Saves 50% of review time
Actual Codex output C08
Unsupported. Exclude from customer copy.
Supplied input P1
The service supplies a review-board template.
Actual Codex output C02
Supported as supplied assertion.
Supplied input P4
Delivery is by email after a manual order check.
Actual Codex output C05
Preserve the manual step; do not imply instant delivery.
Excerpts from the supplied brief and recorded response. A demonstration of the files, not an included app.
Opens WhatsApp for a manual order.
Not immediate. UK consumer delivery follows the legal cancellation period. AI accounts and tools separate.
Read delivery & refund termsWatch the kit walkthrough.
A demonstration of the written files. Fictional examples; AI accounts and apps are separate.
Read the walkthrough transcript
Copywriters, a persuasive sentence has to answer to the brief. Start with the offer, the evidence and the gaps. Then decide how to say it. The Evidence Copy Kit gives you that written sequence: offer extraction, page outline, voice-led draft, newsletter and claim audit. Its original method asks you to keep the source, scope and conditions beside each claim. In the fictional Luma Desk example, a template and an onboarding call are supplied facts. Performance claims have no proof. The actual recorded response builds a ledger, marks the unsupported claims and asks for price and date rather than inventing them. See the supplied input and real output together, labelled as a fictional demonstration. You get twenty main items: one original skill and nineteen adapted prompts, with credits. Free brief, style and decision templates and workflow notes are separate. £25, paid once. Order through WhatsApp for manual email delivery. Delivery is not immediate; agree the date before payment. Bring your own AI account. Give the argument a source.
Video credits
Legend Mode Skill / Designer58. Arte própria da encomenda; fonte Anybody OFL1.1 · Legend Mode Skill / síntese original tarefa59. Licença própria da encomenda; uso comercial pela empresa · Voz preset Runway; geração por Patrick / Legend Mode Skill. Runway Usage rights, uso comercial conforme registro central
Anybody font under SIL OFL 1.1; the complete licence is on the credits page. Captions are part of the video image; a text transcript is supplied here.
Put the decision back in your hands
The Evidence Copy Kit puts offer facts, proof gaps, voice and claim review into one written method. Watch a supplied fictional brief become a real generated claim ledger, with its limits intact. One original skill, 19 adapted prompts and separate free extras.
A bold number with no study? An inclusion that vanished in the headline? A confident sentence with no source? Start the sales argument at the evidence desk. The method asks you to separate supplied facts, unsupported claims and the questions that still need an answer.
You are buying a curated collection of written workflows, files, guides and licensed adaptations for this profession.
See what the source becomes.
Fictional input. Real generated text.
Human judgement still required.
Read the actual decision
Use the controls in the opening demonstration to inspect each source and its recorded output. Both remain labelled; the output is an excerpt, not a complete deliverable.
- C08 — Unsupported claim. Source case 1; response excerpt from the evidence-copy-desk trial.
- C02 — Offer fact. Source case 1; response excerpt from the evidence-copy-desk trial.
- C05 — Delivery condition. Source case 1; response excerpt from the evidence-copy-desk trial.
What this proves
A real Codex response exists for this fictional en-US case. The selected text is shown literally. It does not establish a win over another prompt, customer results, time savings or compatibility with other apps.
These examples describe the fictional Luma Desk brief. Its template and onboarding call are not part of the kit sold here.
Completed review: scope and results
Completed internal review, 31 October 2026: five fictional en-US cases in Codex CLI 0.166.0, with a one-line prompt, a good prompt and the original skill. Each response was assessed against five frozen binary rubric criteria. The skill met 23/25 criteria; the good prompt met 21/25 and the one-line prompt 24/25. The skill scored above the good prompt in 2/5 cases and did not pass the predefined threshold of three strict case wins. Ties did not count as wins. This was a local agent assessment of written responses, without external professional validation. The requested model was gpt-6.1-sol, recorded in the headers but not independently confirmed by model JSON. These are documentary rubric results, not measured time savings, productivity, finished media quality, app compatibility or general superiority. Rubric limits remain: some design checks required a CTA absent from the brief; some copy checks required source IDs for supplied conditions without IDs. The rubric was not changed after seeing the outputs.
Final work needs your professional checks.
Build the argument from the evidence up
evidence-copy-desk puts a claim ledger before persuasive drafting. Bring the approved facts and voice examples, choose the task and carry source IDs through the draft. The five sections cover the working sequence:
- Offer extraction: instructions for a ledger of facts, conditions, sources and gaps.
- Service-page outline: message, deliverables, evidence, conditions and a suitable CTA.
- First draft: instructions that keep the approved voice separate from changes to facts.
- Newsletter: instructions for adapting an approved argument without adding proof.
- Claim audit: a sentence-by-sentence review method with source passages and unresolved questions.
Know every file
before you buy.
20 main items.
Free extras kept separate.
20 main items: one original professional skill and 19 adapted third-party prompts. The original sources are publicly available. The price covers the original method, selection, professional adaptations and guide, not exclusive access to those sources. Credits and Apache-2.0 licence text are included.
evidence-copy-desk
One original professional skill. Five connected tasks. Written instructions you can read and adapt to your own authorised work.
Read all 19 adapted prompt descriptions
- Criteria-led draft review
Review a service-page draft against clarity, voice and evidence criteria.
- Work from the supplied context
Anchor copy in the authorised product facts rather than remembered benefits.
- Keep an approved output pattern
Keep an approved brand-voice/section pattern using owned examples.
- Extract requirements in source order
Extract offer counts, conditions and deliverables before drafting.
- Separate proposal and review roles
Separate copy proposals from an evidence/voice edit.
- Structured source summary
Summarise an interview into a source-linked newsletter or article brief.
- Names and spelling ledger
Audit product, person and company name spelling in a case draft.
- Premise to outline to short draft
Write an article or service-page section in approved outline stages.
- Visible product facts to concept notes
Use when turning a product sketch into visual/message concepts and visible features must stay separate from supplied technical claims and assumptions.
- Source comparison worksheet
Use when two approved primary documents must be compared before a factual difference can enter a case, service page or client brief.
- B2B research brief with evidence
Use before a B2B case interview or first draft when the copywriter needs a bounded research brief with explicit unanswered questions.
- Claim-to-quote evidence gate
Use before editorial approval to check whether each proposed claim has an exact source passage and whether that passage supports the whole claim.
- Feedback sentiment for editorial review
Use to organise redacted feedback into possible editorial objections while preserving ambiguous or mixed reactions for human reading.
- Topic and relevance triage
Use to sort revision requests or source articles into editorial topics without confusing a passing mention with the main issue.
- Section and locale prefixes
Use after the message is approved to keep a short headline/benefit/CTA handoff in the requested section order and locale.
- Missing-proof and off-scope response
Use at intake when the request is outside the agreed writing remit or lacks evidence needed for a factual commercial promise.
- Constraint reasoning worksheet
Use when dimensions, offer conditions or brief restrictions appear to conflict and the professional needs an explicit constraint worksheet before choosing a plan.
- Owned-text localisation by blocks
Use to localise an owned, approved draft block by block while preserving the evidence map and commercial conditions.
- Authorised memo to voice-led draft
Use when an author has an authorised memo and two owned posts and wants a new draft with observable voice features and traceable facts.
See the separate free extras
- Blank professional brief
Collect approved facts, constraints, rights, format and open questions.
- Blank approved-style card
Record two authorised examples, a rejected example and approved style choices.
- Decision and review log
Track feedback, source, owner, approval and unresolved checks.
- Practical workflow notes PDF + text
A short guide to preparing inputs, asking for useful drafts and reviewing them.
The original sources are publicly available; the adapted prompts are not exclusive. Use the original material under its included permission and the third-party adaptations under their applicable Apache-2.0 terms. Keep required credits, notices and licence text. Restrictions on original material do not override third-party rights. The kit is not endorsed by Google, Anthropic or OpenAI.
Open the files.
Bring your judgement.
Unzip and read
After delivery, unzip the attachment on your own device. Read GUIDE.md, the original skill and the credits before choosing a task.
Prepare an authorised source
Supply a redacted B2B service brief, evidence IDs and authorised voice examples. Choose offer extraction, an outline, a first draft, a newsletter or a claim audit. Use the instructions in your own AI environment, then review every proposed claim against the supplied source before approving the text.
Review in your own tools
This ZIP does not verify a fact by writing it, send a newsletter or publish a page. It does not promise conversions, ranking, original research or an approved client voice. Regulated health, legal and financial claims are outside this writing scope.
Accounts, plans and installation limits
You need a way to unzip and read text/PDF files. Running a prompt requires your own suitable AI account or text environment; no app installation or compatibility is confirmed for this release. Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini apps have not been tested. Accounts, paid plans, APIs, media tools and credits are not included. Final production uses your own professional tools.
The recorded Codex case is a text trial, not a test of account installation or every item. No plan recommendation or software access is included.
A method you can
make your own.
Evidence Copy Kit · United Kingdom
GBP · one-time payment for the ZIP
Get the kit via WhatsAppOpens WhatsApp. The order and payment are checked manually.
Before payment
Confirm the seller’s identity, kit contents, payment options, final total, currency, any applicable charges, delivery date and cancellation instructions in a record you can keep. No software, AI account, paid plan, API use or credits are included.
UK delivery is not immediate
Delivery is not immediate. For covered consumer contracts, the ZIP is emailed after the statutory 14-day cancellation period has ended, with correct cancellation information and an exact date agreed before payment. Day 15 after the contract is an operational reference only if no legal extension applies. This round does not request an advance waiver. If required information is missing or the period is extended, the condition must be resolved before payment is taken. The commercial refund guarantee also applies after delivery.
ZIP attachment, manually sent
The kit is sent as a file to the email address you provide after manual order and payment checks. This page does not take payment or automatically send files.
Time to read it.
Room to change your mind.
14-day commercial refund guarantee
Cancel before delivery, or ask for a full refund for any reason within 14 calendar days, counted from the day after successful, accessible delivery. A failed delivery does not start the period. Downloading or using the files does not remove this guarantee.
Request through WhatsApp +55 31 99367-9889. No administration fee. We process refunds without undue delay, within 14 days of the request, or sooner where mandatory law requires. Your mandatory rights remain available.
Read the full cancellation & refund policyBefore you ask
for the kit.
Is this software or an AI subscription?
You need a way to unzip and read text/PDF files. Running a prompt requires your own suitable AI account or text environment; no app installation or compatibility is confirmed for this release. Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini apps have not been tested. Accounts, paid plans, APIs, media tools and credits are not included. Final production uses your own professional tools.
Will it work in Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini?
Those apps have not been tested for this release. The displayed trial used Codex and a fictional text input. Choose and verify your own suitable text environment. Media generation, APIs and professional finishing tools are separate.
What was tested, and what am I buying?
Completed internal review, 31 October 2026: five fictional en-US cases in Codex CLI 0.166.0, with a one-line prompt, a good prompt and the original skill. Each response was assessed against five frozen binary rubric criteria. The skill met 23/25 criteria; the good prompt met 21/25 and the one-line prompt 24/25. The skill scored above the good prompt in 2/5 cases and did not pass the predefined threshold of three strict case wins. Ties did not count as wins. This was a local agent assessment of written responses, without external professional validation. The requested model was gpt-6.1-sol, recorded in the headers but not independently confirmed by model JSON. These are documentary rubric results, not measured time savings, productivity, finished media quality, app compatibility or general superiority. Rubric limits remain: some design checks required a CTA absent from the brief; some copy checks required source IDs for supplied conditions without IDs. The rubric was not changed after seeing the outputs.
The offer is the documented curation of 20 main items, with written workflows, guides, examples and licences. Codex is the trial environment; Codex and other AI apps, accounts and subscriptions are not included in your purchase.
What is included in the price?
One original skill, 19 adapted third-party prompts, the guide and the separate free extras described above. This is a one-time digital kit price. Confirm all final charges before payment.
When will I receive the ZIP?
Delivery is not immediate. For covered consumer contracts, the ZIP is emailed after the statutory 14-day cancellation period has ended, with correct cancellation information and an exact date agreed before payment. Day 15 after the contract is an operational reference only if no legal extension applies. This round does not request an advance waiver. If required information is missing or the period is extended, the condition must be resolved before payment is taken. The commercial refund guarantee also applies after delivery.
Can I use client material?
Use fictional or authorised, appropriately redacted material. Check rights and your chosen provider’s data practices first. Do not send confidential client files or sensitive information through the order conversation.
How do I cancel or report a delivery issue?
Contact WhatsApp +55 31 99367-9889 with the minimum details needed to locate your order. You can cancel before delivery; the additional commercial guarantee and mandatory rights are explained in the refund policy.
A question for your next project
Which exact source passage supports the strongest claim in your draft?
For your own reflection. No answer or contact details are collected here.